Find a Lawyer

SARDAR MUHAMMAD YAQOOB KHAN NASAR versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Section A 42A ()) and Constitution 50 Constitution of Pakistan, Filing of the Constitution Filing of Electoral Expenses When a candidate's return is announced and notified, it will mean that the election filed by him The withdrawal of expenditure was accepted by the Election Commission, as required by section 50 (2) of the Representation People Act, 1976, the process was completed and proceedings could not be initiated against the candidate who returned it. The High Court rejected the Election Commission's order, as the applicant could not be prosecuted for non-availability of election expenses. It is allowed in the circumstances

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2013

• MUHAMMAD KHALID v. The STATE 2013 PCrLJ 1197
• UNIVERSITY STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD v. RECTOR, INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD 2013 PLC(CS) 1254
• MUHAMMAD ZAHID KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1254
• Ms. ANBER JAVED v. BAHRIA UNIVERSITY 2013 CLC 1351
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX v. SARHAD WOOLLEN MILLS (PVT.) LTD. 2013 PTD 1389
• SME BANK LTD. v. CHAIRMAN APPELLATE AUTHORITY 2013 PTD 1400
• Ch. MUHAMMAD YASIN v. WAFAQI MOHTASIB (OMBUDSMAN) 2013 CLC 1441
• RASHEED BAIG v. ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMITED 2013 PLC(CS) 1444

All Islamabad judgments of 2013 →

tax advocates from Phagwar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes