COCA COLA MAZDOOR UNION versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, SINDH
Section 2 (xiii) (xxix), 12, 24 and 41 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Sector 3 Referendum for Determination of Collective Bargaining Agents Involved in Voters \ Currently Existing Stocks The terms of the current collective bargaining agent. After the expiry, the referendum for the determination of the collective bargaining agent for the next term was to be held in the Establishment of the Appellant Union, which said it intended to participate in the referendum, dismissing its 53 members. Was made and the complaint filed against him stated that the Labor Court was suspended before the appellant. The union provided the required list of its members, which stated that 53 members, and the Registrar Trade Unions finalized the list for the purpose of secret ballot responders / current unions, filed a constitutional petition stating It has been said that 53 members are not workers and do not deserve to be. To be included in the voter High List single judge of the High Court rated by Judiciality in section 2 (xxix) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008, the definition of worker or worker, as far as the terminating worker is concerned Will depend on the credentials, etc., that were or were the result of an industrial dispute. ; However, in the present case, the parties' alleged disputes have no connection or relevance to any industrial dispute, nor have they been taken by the Collective Bargaining Agent under Section 41 or 50 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008. And such a conflict was never raised as an industrial dispute because according to section 60 of the Act, 53 people were not employed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
