IRFAN MERCHANT versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Arts 5 and 9 Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations 2002, Regular 21 Constitution To bring about any change in the Pakistan Master Plan, a public hearing should be heard, especially to all those who are likely to be affected by such act. Which was not done. Under Article 9 (2) (ii) of the Pakistan Defense Officers Housing Authority Order, 1980, it was the only executive board that had the authority to act in pursuit of any scheme or scheme, the Pakistan Defense Officers Housing Authority Order of 1980. Under Article 9 (3) no master plan, plan or development scheme could be developed. The Governing Body's refusal to implement such a conversion without any advice from any local body or agency and with the approval of the Executive Board High Court refuses. With the consent of the Executive Board, the High Court directed the Defense Housing Authority to immediately restore the original position of the roads covered and if any change in the master plan was required for the public interest, after the procedure and all concerned persons Can be done according to law. Is issuing a public hearing notice to the officials on the board and all those who are likely to be affected by this change / conversion, under which the petition was allowed \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
