MST. FEROZA BEGUM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR
Section 34 and 35 Registration Rules, 1929, R 135 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of Registration Officers Registration Officer's jurisdiction in relation to the determination of the denial of registration before the execution of the Registration Officer's jurisdiction. Intended to execute them, which the scope petitioner executed on the gift deadline and presented it to the Registration Officer for registration. Which refused to register the document on the basis that the document was submitted by the local commission for registration through the firm Jambandi, which led to the issuance of a mortgage instead of selling the property (firdbay) and It had no notes in red ink. Regarding the nature of the applicant's property, it was that under Regulation 135 of Registration Rules 1929. The registering officer was obliged to file the gift and he could not demand a fiduciary note from the officer in red ink under Section 34 and 35 of the Registration Act, 1908. To determine if a document exists. In the present case, the latest First Bay Registration Officer has objected to the local commission objecting to Jim Bondi, to satisfy himself with regard to the identity of the executing officers. Because it did not satisfy whether it was implemented by the required personnel, the person was released for record purposes and not for transfer purposes, to the local commission. Bay needs to be presented to ensure that those who perform the gift process have
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
