Find a Lawyer

SALMAN MUJAHID versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI

Article 199 Intervention or delay of constitutional application Legal effect will not be restricted to every class of constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. The question of delay in filing the constitutional petition will be examined with the facts of each case where the facts of the case and the requirements of justice. It has been demanded, many years can be neglected or some months may be deadly. Delayed equity will not help equity and neither will the unforgettable high courts refuse to help a party. Worked hard, alert and careful.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ASGHAR ALI v. State 2013 MLD 283
• Ms. UZMA MASOOD v. ORIENT COMMUNICATIONS (PVT.) LTD. 2013 YLR 284
• Syed MUZAHIR HUSSAIN QUADRI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2013 PLD 285
• ABDUL REHMAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 287
• ARABIAN SEA ENTERPRISES LIMITED v. ABID AMIN BHATTI 2013 PLD 290
• Mst. ISHRAT JEHAN v. Syed ANIS-UR-REHMAN 2013 CLC 291
• CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE (PAKISTAN) LIMITED v. CUMMINS MIDDLE EAST FZE through Chief Executive 2013 CLD 291
• FAZAL MUSTAFA v. State 2013 PCrLJ 294

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

list of advocates from Jaja Abasian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes