Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAZAL MUSTAFA versus STATE


Application under Sections 249A, 561A, 439 and 439A Section 555A, CRPC, filed directly before the High Court without reference to the sessions court, CRPC nature petition under Section 6161A CRPC referred directly to the High Court by the Tire Court under Section 6161A, CRPC, without challenging it in this amending jurisdiction under Section 999,9439A before the Sessions Court. Referred directly to the High Court, clause A of CCPC's clause 616161 was not intended to provide an alternative treatment to the CCPC when a distressed person had any treatment available under section 561 AA This question arises to ask for the inherent powers of the Vert. Challenge the jurisdiction, if any, in the jurisdiction under section 9439, 9 Cr9A, CRPC, as the aforesaid provisions specifically offer treatment to the affected person. The request for y was not permanent and was excluded under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Sanghi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.