Definition of evidence from Section 2392 / Rob 34 robbery, joint intention not to be examined by the prosecution of the case star witnesses (the complainant and his wife, who returned several articles) based on the collection of the missing article ( The appellant was arrested and the robbery and other articles were recovered from the appellant, including a mobile phone, which is alleged to have complained to the complainant and his wife looted several articles. And only the effect of mobile phone recovery was shown. The recovery of the accused cannot be relied exclusively on the absence of evidence of the complainant, even after six months of the alleged robbery, to approve the accused's conviction, the accused's conviction and The sentence was set aside and he was acquitted of the charge
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
