Find a Lawyer

JAN SHER KHAN versus STATE

Article 133 The cross-examination was a valuable right guaranteed by the Legislature through the Legislature to challenge the authenticity of a witness, and to examine the fact of the defendant's testimony to include facts in support of his defense. The rule of witness was entitled. Will the witness who entered the witness room explain what he had to say about the oath? And then a complete statement is made subject to cross examination if the accused was denied the opportunity to cross-examine, such evidence as a general rule of evidence was not legally acceptable against the accused principles.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• VICTORIA FURNITURE MART v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLC 1541
• AHMED KHAN v. Mst. BILQEES BEGUM 2013 YLR 1545
• KHALID v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1547
• SAEED AKBAR v. AASHIQUE ALI 2013 CLC 1553
• PERVAIZ IQBAL CHOUDHRY v. IRSHAD ALI 2013 PCrLJ 1556
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. MUHAMMAD AKBAR BHATTI 2013 CLC 1561
• AMROZE KHAN v. MOTASER KHAN 2013 MLD 1564
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division, Pakistan Secretariat, Islamabad 2013 PTD 1568

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Bajaur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes