INAM ULLAH ZAFAR versus ORIX LEASING PAKISTAN LIMITED
Sections 12 and 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) The suit for recovery of lease finance had no private status on the lease of the contract, excluding the Maintenance Appellant, as it was under it. Considering that no guarantees were implemented. He said the decision and decision of the lease agreement were approved by the Banking Court, which resulted in the Banking Court wanting to have jurisdiction even though a decision could be passed if the leave application for defense was not filed within time. Or he was rejected but said that the court is bound to determine its real responsibility. The defendants were able to retain the CPC under section 12 (2) of the decree, the financial institutions (recovery of finances) under the act created under the Ordinance, 2001 Banking Court Appellant's Liability The decision was bound to take place while the ratification of the decision would lead to a misunderstanding of justice. If the applicant is allowed to remain in the field of the previous judgment and order, the application filed under Section 12 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001 read with section 12 (2), CPC Was accepted and the verdict was declared inviolable and the order was subject to payment of 50% of the deductible amount within a specified period, the appeal was accepted in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
