Article 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 161, 165, 343 and 34 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Government Employees, Pleading In addition to Legal Compensation in respect of Public Employee Government employee FIR lodged against the accused, joint intent, criminal misconduct, consolidation, criminal misconduct, acquittal of valuables, acquittal of valuables, three or more days in connection with business transactions by such public servant. The delay in doing so (the police officer) and the co-accused (police officers) was that they had complained for three days before being detained in the public quarters. A year ndh forcibly took away cash and mobile phone and punish bribery suspects were released without any explanation about the incident was that FIR FIR was registered laboratory. The co-accused whose case was similar to the accused had already been released on bail. That during the interrogation, the complainant took an oath under which he excluded the accused from the commission of the alleged crime, and that the fugitive would not be relieved of his bail as his case was one of further investigations. Which was a year's delay in approaching. The court did not specify how to file an FIR. The accused's case was consistent with the case of the accused, who was granted bail despite appearing in the challan, the accused was entitled to the same treatment. He was released on bail, under conditions
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
