HAJI NAIMATULLAH versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
Section 20 Appointment of Arbitrator by Court An Appointment of Arbitration by an Interesting Party The Appellant Appeals to Appointment of Arbitration by a Tribunal Under Section 20, the Appointment of the Arbitrator, while the Defendants' Standing That the arbitration appointment procedure and forum were provided in the agreement between the parties through the arbitration clause The plaintiff's position was that the arbitration clause of the agreement provided that, in the event of a dispute, appointment by the sole arbitration secretary Had to be , The Ministry of Law, Justice and the Federal Government's Ministry of Human Rights, and since this ministry was reorganized and added that since the federal government itself is a party to this agreement, it cannot be a judge on its own cause. Is. The method of appointment provided by the agreement was invalid, and it should also be determined by the court, arguing that the federal government, being a party to the contract, could not decide on its own purpose, was not enforceable. , Because the interest identified by an arbitrator did not in any way invalidate the appointment of such arbitrator, and it was only in the case when such interest was kept invisible or existed after the appointment. That the appointment was invalid or liable to be canceled and the plaintiff was in fact at the time of entering into the agreement. It was well-known that, in the event of a dispute, the same should be sent to the federal government for the appointment of an arbitrator, therefore, the plaintiff was now barred from objecting to the appointment made by the federal government when the plaintiff's ministry Agreement to submit mediation by an arbitrator selected by
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
