Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
P L D 2017 Sindh 79
Before Sajjad Ali Shah and Muhammad Junaid Ghajfar, JJ
SINDH RURAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION (SRSO) through Authorised Attorney—Petitioner
versus
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Cabinet Division and 3 others—Respondents
Constitutional Petition No.D-4136 of 2012, decided on 24th November
2015.
Auditor General’s (Functions, Powers and Terms and Conditions of Service) Ordinance (XXIII of 2001)—
—S. 8—Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 169 & 170—-Auditor General, powers of— Audit of company— Provincial Government funds— Petitioner company was engaged in managing public sector Healthcare Infrastructure programmes funded by Provincial Government— Plea raised by petitioner was that under agreement with Provincial Government audit was to be conducted by independent auditors and not by Auditor General—Validity—Provisions of Auditor GeneraVs (Functions, Powers and Terms and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2001, were in line with the provision of Art. 169 of the Constitution, as it defined functions and powers of Auditor General in respect of both, the accounts of Federation and of Provinces as well as accounts of any authority or body established by Federation or a Province— Such were two distinct provisions, one of which related to accounts of Federation and the Provinces and the other for the account of any Authority or body established by Federation or a Province— Funds utilized by petitioner were provided from the account of Province and Federation, therefore, provision of Auditor General’s (Functions, Powers and Terms and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2001, were neither beyond the scope and mandate of Art. 169 of the Constitution nor were ultra vires to the Constitution—Auditor General of Pakistan had authority to audit accounts of petitioner by virtue of Arts. 169 & 170 of the Constitution read with S.8 of Auditor General’s (Functions, Powers and Terms and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2001—Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances, [pp. 87, 88] A, B & C
Hamid Mir and others v. Federation of Pakistan 2013 SCMR 1880 and Suo Motu Case No. 12 of 2015 ref.
Ali Almani for Petitioner.
Salman Talibuddin Addl. Attorney General of Pakistan along with Ainuddin Khan, D.A.G, for Respondents
Date of hearing: 15th October, 2015.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer