Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
P L D 2017 Lahore 882
Before Ayesha A. Malik and Jawad Hassan, JJ
ABU TALIB KHAN BARKI—Appellant
versus
JUDGE FAMILY COURT and others—Respondents
I.-C.A. No. 1175 of 2015, decided on 19th September, 2017.
Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)—
—S. 10 (4) & proviso—Dissolution of marriage on the basis of Khula—Haq Mehr, restoration of—Special condition of Nikkah not related to Haq Mehr—Husband impugned order of Family Court whereby khula was granted to wife—Contention of husband, inter alia, was that the wife was required to return gold given as Haq Mehr in lieu of decree of dissolution of marriage, which was not ordered by Family Court—Validity—Husband relied on cl. 17 of the Nikkahnama which provided for special condition attached to contract of marriage, which condition was not related to Haq Mehr, but was an independent clause, and any item given under the said clause did not have to be returned by wife at time of grant of Khula—No illegality therefore existed in impugned order—Intra-court appeal was dismissed, in circumstances. [p. 884] A & B
Tariq Masood for Appellant.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer