Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAISAL versus STATE

Section 14 Foreign Order, 1951, Sections 3 and 2 (a) were accused of defining evidence, although it appeared to be Bengali only, but they produced documents, which their respective government departments / agencies had rightly called. That supported them. There is no need to hold a citizenship certificate, it is requested to prove that the accused or his parents had entered Pakistan illegally after 1972, but the prosecution has taken their case through any document or evidence. Failure to prove that the prosecutor relied on the statements of the accused when he was detained, whose statements did not matter, contrary to the provisions of the law evidence, 1984, the trial court upheld its decision on speculation and limitation. And failed to discuss the evidence involved. The trial was sent by the trial court to verify the documents presented in the evidence that the accused was a Pakistani national; and when they were declared genuine, in such a case, the allegations of speculation and speculation. Instead of pleading guilty and making naked statements by the accused while they were in custody, they should have been acquitted immediately. Mann, set aside and the defendants acquitted for not being law-abiding Pakistan, top advocate family court from Gujrat lawyer