FEROZE SHAMSI versus PROVINCE OF SINDH, MINISTREY OF COOPFRATTON, THROUGH SECRETARY COOPERATION
Sections 17B and 19 Cooperative Society Rules, 1927, R4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application regarding the transfer of membership property of a housing society to a membership of the transfer of property located in a dispute between the parties. Was. The society's contention was that even though the transfer was owned by the property they purchased, they could not be granted the right to vote because they did not meet the terms of the society's by-laws. They themselves maintained the situation by selling plots to those who met a member's standard when care was not taken and the members themselves transferred all their interest to a person without the ability of the buyer's membership. When selected, the new owner acquires all the interested persons. The seller could not be denied membership because the government-approved order was a wrong order, which led to the High Court declaring that Section 17B of the Co-operative Society Act, 1925 had a higher status than the Co-operative Society Rules, 1927. In the same way, by the Co-operative Societies' by-laws, the High Court has also declared that a person who has received property from a former member has also obtained membership. Under the Bio-Laws, this restriction can be restricted only until section 17B of the Cooperative Society Act, 1925, except for any restriction of property purchased, other than the Society. Was. Presumably petition petition was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Phalia lawyer