MUHAMMAD TAHIR versus STATE
Sections 395 and 411 of the witnesses testified before the trial court that the faces of the culprits had been erected and they were unable to state in clear words if the same individuals who were tried in court were not the accused. Were connected with them in the circumstances. However, the actual commission of the crime of recovering various cash from the possession of the accused, however, was proved by the prosecution's witnesses that the accused persons did not present any evidence that it was To say that they were falsely involved in the case. He said that in cases related to the collection of money from his own possession, the accused were declared guilty under Section 411, PPC State Council also admitted that the evidence presented before the trial court So far, confidence has not been encouraged to establish the identity of the accused. The conviction for the original culprit of the incident in this case was related to the prosecution of each accused by the trial court, it was converted to one under section 111111, PPC and sentenced Was reduced to one of these, in the past. They were ordered to be released
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Haveli Kahuta lawyer