MUHAMMAD NAEEM QURESHI versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Customs Act (IV of 1969); Sections 156 (1) (9), (14), (14A), (43), (47), 16, 32 (1) (2), 32 A, 78, 80 and 178 bail, the grant of further investigation role was the clearing agent of the accused and at no stage was shown to be of significant benefit, the accused was arrested on the statement of the co-accused. The incident, which had already been submitted by the prosecution, was a financial crime. The documentary evidence importers and other government officials involved with the accused were not arrested. On the contrary, they are trying to pardon the accused; the accused, who was sent to jail, did not need further prosecution for further investigation or recovery; the full evidence in the case was documented. In one of the further investigations, under the circumstances, the accused was admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hazro lawyer