Find a Lawyer

MST. FEROZE BEGUM versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Sections 19, 20 and 21 of the Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 claimant for possession of separate huts located on a plot of about 80 square yards in the applicant colony entitled to allotment of slums in Kachi population, challenged the Act. Officials said that the plot, which was in their possession, was located within the limits of the Katchi population and that their huts were used for construction of the Lyari Expressway, with no compensation and the use of alternate plots of the same size. Were entitled. In its allotment under the Sindh Kuchi Population Act 1987, the Additional Advocate General has said that the victims' claims of Lyari Expressway are being investigated and if applicants have filed their claims, they will be examined like other concerned persons. Will be investigated. It was satisfied with the above statement and did not pressurize the request, which was dealt with independently, present your claims regarding the applicants to the relevant authority who will decide within the specified period and it cannot be said that The Authority has committed contempt for each of the applicants by separately allocating compensation and alternative plots, especially when the court did not order it to be dealt with because of the suppression of the petition. had gone family advocate from Panjgur lawyer