MUHARRAM versus STATE
The Judges Counsel for Section 7 Jud7 Appellants identified some weaknesses in the contents of the trial court's decision in which it was requested that the same inadmissible state councilor openly admit that the decision of the case could not be retained. And the trial has been granted because of a deficiency in the court's decision. The contents, barely allowed to be present, were voluntarily put aside, the unclean verdict, remanded to the trial court for hearing the arguments and a new ruling according to the law within a specified period. The accused was released on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Mamu kunjan lawyer
