Find a Lawyer

SHER KHAN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) evidence was appreciated overnight, but the prosecutor did not show the source of the light in which the prosecution's witnesses saw the incident, although a prosecutor's witness dismissed that the suspect had a moonlight. I saw The distance of half the length of the witnesses to the light source was very clear, and without evidence of this fact, the error of identifying the accused at the time and place of the incident could not be denied, in such cases the prosecution's case was physical and Negatively affected, they did not disclose the names of the suspects to the police officer at the hospital, supported the plea of the suspects that the perpetrators were unknown, the prosecution's witnesses disclosed the incident, and the accused counseling and discussions. Were involved after Neighborhood witnesses did not disclose the presence of the complainant at the scene of the incident. There was no regret in giving the ocular testimony in the circumstances, depending on the identity of the accused at the time and place of the incident. Suspicious, the appeal of the accused was allowed and the request for review to increase the sentence was dropped. how to become a advocate from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer