Find a Lawyer

MST. GUL KHATOON ALIAS GUKKI versus STATE

Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 147, 148, 149 and 34 Guarantees, the refusal to officially reach the arms of the complainant has been very clearly shown that they are dead. Is deliberately killed. All the suspects were also assigned a specific role; all the accused, who came to the complainant's home, were, under the circumstances, liable to commit the murder, regardless of their role. Regardless of the character or section of34 at the time of the incident, the medical evidence available on the PPC record indicates that the deceased had two injuries that were given two handguns and neglected the use of a hatchet from the back at the time of the incident. It could not be denied or denied that the accused party's counter version had no benefit in extending their bail, given the FIR's ocular evidence as well as the specific role attributed to each of them in the medical evidence. ? No case was set for bail to the accused in connection with the crime. Each case has its own specific circumstances and cannot be equated with any other case. Section 497, Sub-section (1) of the PC was repulsed for the simple reason that the accused women had participated fully at the time of the incident and did not hesitate to commit the murder of the two youths. They did not benefit under the circumstances. The case is not worth further investigation, the trial court rightly rejected the bail filed by the accused persons, the bail application was dismissed. how to become a advocate from Charsada lawyer