Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD PUNHAL CHACHAR versus STATE

Section 395/337H (2) / 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) Appeals to the party on the charge of evasion, despite having come to the land of the complainant on a donkey cart. Equipped him with a lesson to help his enemies, neither beat him nor his son nor hurt him in the fire and instead of teaching the complainant a lesson, he used a water machine and his Took the diesel filled drum and fled. Donkey cart from there was not affected by such evidence, allegedly aerial shootings by the accused were not established as there was no crime by the police record of hostility between the parties. Was set up and not even a water machine. The confessed crime victim and the recovery witness did not support the prosecution's case. The complainant did not prove his ownership of the aforementioned water maki, which was publicly and freely available in the market. And the experts were used by agriculture. The complainant's testimony was tainted with Malala and the prosecutor's case was not free of any doubt. No illegal matter was disclosed during the court trial decision. Was. After his victory doubled, which could not be lightly dismissed in the absence of strong evidence, the appeal against the accused's fate was dismissed in the circumstances. tax advocates from Sudhnoti lawyer