Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. PARVEEN ARA versus PROVINCE OF SINDH


Article 199 Constitutional Applicant The applicant risked his residential building because of the jeopardy of the property during the proposed construction because the respondent of the court had to inspect the site because of the construction on the adjacent plot of Nazir. Was said to take pictures of the status of a residential building. After the spot inspection, applicant Nazir had said that the proposed construction would not affect the applicant's residential building, there was no objection. The Nazir report of the relevant court authority also filed comments saying it was undergoing construction. According to the plan approved with minor violations which was dealt with by the applicant, with the consent of the applicant, if there was any damage to the applicant's residential building due to the proposed construction. Taken on the plot adjacent to the respondents, the applicant will have liberty to file a case for damages and / or recovery.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Jhal Magsi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.