Find a Lawyer

MST. PARVEEN ARA versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Article 199 Constitutional Applicant The applicant risked his residential building because of the jeopardy of the property during the proposed construction because the respondent of the court had to inspect the site because of the construction on the adjacent plot of Nazir. Was said to take pictures of the status of a residential building. After the spot inspection, applicant Nazir had said that the proposed construction would not affect the applicant's residential building, there was no objection. The Nazir report of the relevant court authority also filed comments saying it was undergoing construction. According to the plan approved with minor violations which was dealt with by the applicant, with the consent of the applicant, if there was any damage to the applicant's residential building due to the proposed construction. Taken on the plot adjacent to the respondents, the applicant will have liberty to file a case for damages and / or recovery. jobs for fresh advocates from Tando Jam lawyer