Find a Lawyer

K.M. ENTERPRISES versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI

In the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 plots allotment queries were regularly allotted to PTCL, subsequently canceled and subsequently allotted to the petitioner's predecessor. The plots were sold to the applicant and the transfer to the authority said that the applicant in the name of PTCL, had never been approached by any authority or forum after the alleged cancellation, after the allotment of the plots in the name of cancellation. 'S order had approached the authority to regulate the plots in the committee and questions to pay regular fees. Yes, but the Authority refused to charge regular fees for illegal consideration once the Authority allocated the plot to the applicant and pocketed the allotment fee and other required fees, and could not turn over the PTCL brief Could not hold meeting. In the given circumstances the Petitioner was directed by H to submit this amount to the Committee which collected the regular fees within the stipulated period under the Sindh Urban Estate Land (Allotment, Conversion and Exchange Cancellation) Ordinance 2001. As was fixed ask a advocate free from Makli lawyer