Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABBASI ENTERPRISES THROUGH PROPRIETOR AND ANOTHER versus COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, PESHAWAR THROUGH COLLECTOR


The relevant additional tax period in the case of section 34 (1) [without change by the Finance Act, 2005] was from July 2003 to June 2004, so the additional tax under section 34 of the non-sale section 34 (1) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. Apply to apply. Was not compulsory and the authorities have the discretion to allow any exemption. Each case had to be decided on its own merits whether tax evasion was intentional or illegal, which would have an impact on the decision. The question of collection of additional tax, where non-payment of sales tax within the tax period was neither wolf nor could it be considered as non-theft from payment duty, to receive additional tax as penalty or otherwise as per law. was not.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.