Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALAMGIR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Article 148 Section R599 (I) / 91 Dated 30 6 Establishment of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Office (XXV of 2000) in 1991; Section 2 (3) exempts the customs authority from income tax imposed on imported raw materials. In spite of presenting a valid certificate of immunity in writing by the Income Tax Certificate Authority of Inquiry, the Deputy Collector Customs exceeded its powers and received the Income Tax from the complainant Telefonk and sought clarification in this case. The written requests were not answered. The complainant requested redress and appropriate action. If his action against the deputy collector was found to be wrong, the customs collector submitted that the registration bill was filed on 19 9 2003. The inspection staff estimated that on 26 9 2003, 279 In 2003, the exemption certificate was presented on the income tax so it was received because there was no certificate. The photocopy of the correctness of the bill for the relevant entry (on record) was not clearly indicated at the time of diagnosis. Indicate that duties and taxes were submitted on the same day, 279 2003 when the assessment was completed. The certificate was presented when during the hearing, the applicant's representative did not contradict the request made by the department representative or his agent did not confirm it. The complainant to the Customs Department had written a protest against the payment of income tax. The department found its interaction "careless" \ failure to issue the necessary explanation against such indifference and failure \ The department representative acknowledged and demanded the necessary explanation be issued. law websites from Washuk lawyer