Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHURSHID versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Recovery of the Company by the Complaint and Another Person Deleting Bad Reward Rules Regarding Information on the Central Excise Establishment of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XNXVV 2000 of 2000), Sections 9 (4), 11 and 13 Provide information on Central Excise Duty to the Collector from. The collectors were rewarded with Rs 1,46,667 by Central Excise Duty but they were not satisfied and they demanded a large sum of money as their request was rejected, so they filed the Federal Ombudsman. Filed a complaint with the person who transferred it. Accurate information about the Federal Tax Ombudsman was provided from the official records of the collector where the complainant worked before his retirement The complainant was working in conjunction with the other complainant because the complainant was in the hands of the complainant. Did not come, the rules for awarding the award were not comprehensive, the concerned authorities did not pay proper attention to the issues related to it and took it in a negligent manner which led to suspicion of their dishonor. Revenue authorities were investigated. In order to avoid erosion in the credibility of the department He could, CBR recommends that you create a role for the committee to consider current affairs. Dismiss and report the rules for implementing comprehensive and consistent reward rules in relation to income tax, sales tax, customs and excise duty. jobs for advocates from Shemier lawyer