Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID versus MST. MEHMOODA KHANUM

A. XVI, Rr 1 & 2 List of witnesses to the Sindh Chief Court Rules (O section), R209 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 42 and S4 suit declaration, Plaintiff's failure to order and administration The petitioner filed a petition within the prescribed period of seven days after the matter was settled, according to the provisions of Rule 1 (1) of the CPC XVI, a witness who failed to list the witnesses in court. To allow it to be presented. The witnesses nominated in Order XVI, R 1, CPC provided that a list of witnesses should not be issued after seven days. Order XVI, R 2, CPC provided that a party's consent Will not In addition to the court's permission, call the witnesses listed in the list, after showing any good reason for excluding the witnesses from the list, if the court gives such permission, they will record the reasons. The purpose of filing a list of witnesses was to obtain a plea from the court for witness testimony. The plaintiff / applicant submitted that the list of witnesses could not be submitted due to the inadequate slip and lack of proper advice as filing the nomination slip cannot be considered proper. The list of witnesses did not fall under the technical scope of the testimony under O. XVI, R1, CPC, but failed to show any good reason for not presenting the list of witnesses to the plaintiff / applicant of natural justice. According to the rules, it was strictly a supply. Within the stipulated time frame, the plaintiff's application was dismissed, however, she had the freedom to examine the number of witnesses who voluntarily filed solicitors from Naudero lawyer