Find a Lawyer

RAZZAK STEEL (PVT.) LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE

Before the High Court suspended the receipt of additional sales tax, the second application for the return of the additional duty limit bar of Section 66 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, which was allowed and the High Court declared, in the constitutional application Authorities Receive Extra Sales Taxes The plaintiff company relied on the High Court's declaration, the plaintiff company sued the authorities for the collection of excess sales tax, the authority resisted the lawsuit on the basis that the sales tax act Under section 66 of 1990, the appellant's claim was dismissed by the appellant under sanctions for trial. The Tribunal filed the case on 15 2 1995, and the case was filed on 14 2 1996, because within one year from the date of the order passed by the appellate tribunal under Section 66 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 The case was filed, so the case was not restricted to the judicial decision. The High Court fully authorized the plaintiff to claim forcible recovery of sales tax. The F's question is that the sales tax was illegal and the authorities will return the money to the plaintiff in his case, and the evidence also states that the authorities received a sales tax of Rs 33,808,969 from him. Which was not. Authorities denied, therefore, that the plaintiff was entitled to a refund so the pending suit was ruled in the circumstances. online advocate from Bunner lawyer