Find a Lawyer

JOTAANA ENTERPRISES THROUGH M. SHAHID BAIG (ADVOCATE) versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Formation of sections 59 (1), 61, 62 and 143b of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XVX of 2000), section 2 (3) assessment up to 30 6 under section 59 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Was understood. 2003 was neither assessed to the date of delimitation nor was any notification sent to the complainant / reviewer regarding the approval of the Return Return, as stated in the statement filed under Section 143B of the Income Tax Ordinance. And was excluded from the scope of the Self Assessment Scheme. For the previous assessment year, justification for 1979 was not assessed fairly and carefully The present case was indeed a case of corruption ???? where the inability, inadequacy and prejudice of the tax official was so obvious that it was not easily forgiven. Assessment could have been considered 30 6 was done in 2003 and the subsequent action was not at all hurried after the taxing officer made a mistake and was mistaken for making a duplicate assessment. 30 6 About two years after the assessment year ended in 2005, the taxation officer could resort to another legal action at that time, but the action was in fact illegal and could not be sustained. The Tax Ombudsman was advised by the Tax Ombudsman in the light of a verbal amnesty and that the officer concerned should be warned in the future as the complainant's complaint has been resolved by the First Appellate Authority, so the matter has been closed. r \ n how to become a advocate from Daharki lawyer