Find a Lawyer

ALI MUHAMMAD ALIAS RUSTAM versus STATE

Section 497 (2) offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VII of 1979), section 10 bail, further inquiry into the matter was filed after a delay of seven hours without an appreciable explanation, Witnesses did not support this version. In his statements filed under Section 161, CRPC evidence, he was hearing in the nature of the complainant and the victim, which was not credible, because both of the prosecution witnesses had international charges against the accused. He was described as ambiguous, ill, and what was credible in the FIR as a general story was not verified by eyewitnesses. No trace of violence was found on the victim's body, no semen was found in the vaginal bushes, nor were they sent to the Chemical Examiner. In these circumstances, it would be very difficult to link the accused to the alleged incident; there was no independent evidence against the accused, which was a trialable argument for bail. There was enmity between the accused and the complaining party and this would require further investigation. Is. To guarantee pakistani advocates Bolan lawyer