Find a Lawyer

MIAN MUHAMMAD RIZWAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 10 (1) (2) of the Sales Tax Return Rules, 2002, Rr 4 and 5 Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), Section 2 (3) of the surplus must be forwarded or refunded. The claim of was not processed. On the basis that the complainant's supplier's registration status is invalid and only the receipt confirmation and payment transaction return claims were not valid as the object was doubtful of the complainant's supplier and complainant's authenticity. Is born Refund Claims Accreditation Department acknowledges supplier receipts but fails to finalize refund claim instead they want to confirm the supplier's registration status and this Also want to check if the supply had deposited tax in the treasury at the time of purchase. The complainant on behalf of the complainant claimed that the invoice and other documents have been verified, including the filing of a sales tax on the input invoices. That it paid the supplier in accordance with the provisions of Section 73 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 and if the supplier did not collect sales tax in the state exchequer, it was not the responsibility of the complainant department to commit committed ant By delaying its decision on the complainant's claim for refund and withholding a refund for which the complainant had filed the documents long ago, the Federal Board of Revenue has, for no good reason, recommended that the Central Board Instructs Off Revenue to collect collector sales tax, the complainant's supplier`s registration status Other Calcutta Sales Tax Report top advocate from Kotli Loharan lawyer