Find a Lawyer

MANS ENTERPRISES versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Section 10 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Office (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) imports excessive amount of money to move forward or return, textile services impose sales tax on such services. It was not as if the machinery was claimed as a refund. The Department of Import has ignored his written and oral applications for more than three years. The Department of Judiciality submitted that the supply of textile goods had been vacated after 6-6 2005, the department would be ready to confirm the refund that the complainant had not made any adjustments. Input tax misconduct was implemented as a refund request and the department was not responding to a delay in payment of refunds the Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended The Central Board of Revenue should instruct the competent authority to refund the amount. 252472 After certifying that the complainant did not claim any adjustment in the input tax, after March 2004, when the representative of the department submitted and acted during the complaint proceedings \ r \ n best advocate from Wahi hassain lawyer