Find a Lawyer

M.I. TEXTILE MILLS LTD. versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 36 (3), 34, 33 (2) (CC), 3 and 2 (33) of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 v. XXV), section 2 (3) of collection of tax levied Not imposed or summarized or incorrectly returned. The showcase notice was actually issued after the show notice was issued for not applying the specific section / sub-section of the applicable law in the showcase notice which alleged that the payment of sales tax No stock was supplied and with no explanation. The stock claimed that the show cause notice was issued on 22 3 2003 and that the order was actually passed on 5 of 2005 after 2 years and seven months, while within 45 days of the issuance of the show cause notice, Was needed, which is expandable by another. If an extension is allowed within 90 days, with no evidence, the case was to be decided within 135 days (subject to extension), which was not made, indicating that the judicial officer did not comply with Section 36 of the Sales Tax AC And did not request 34. In the Showcase Notice of T, 1990, the Complainant submitted that, in this case, the Showcase Notice was faulty and there is a subsequent proceeding notice which does not require specific sections / sub-sections of the applicable law for determination / recovery. Used to The liabilities were illegal because in all subsequent proceedings the authority to adjust / recover the tax, and the specific provisions of Sections 36 and 34 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 for additional tax and special clause, under applicable law. Failed to request notice. According to the law, in accordance with the provisions of sub-section ()) of section subse of section 3333, advocates from Bolan lawyer