Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR HASSAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 9, 59A, 50 (4), 50 (4A), 80C, 143B Income Tax Ordinance (XL IX of 2001), Section 122 (5A) Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V) ), Section 2 (3) Refund Assisi claimed that the department had given effect to the appeal and issued notice demanding the refund but the voucher case was withheld without any justification. The Department submitted that the creation of a refund was illegal and an appeal was filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which made the matter a subpoena. A refund voucher was withheld until the appellate authority's decision to file an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order of the appellate authority, whereby the matter was sub judicial, a refund was issued. Was not appropriate If their Tax Appellate Tribunal Complainant / Assisi was not able to target any defect, then the Complainant / Issuer's decision in this case decision should wait. Federal Tax Ombudsman Closes Investigation of Complaint by Department top advocates from Jandanwala lawyer