Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


Sections 162 (2), 169 (3), 122 (1) and 122 (5) collect tax from the person who was not taxed or deducted from it. , Filed a statement under section 69 (3). Income Tax Ordinance 2001, which was considered final for reopening, was required to be taken under section 122 (1) or section 122 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 but instead the department preferred to pass the order. Under section 162 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, which was without any validity subsection (2) of section 162 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, was related to the additional tax and not the officer to collect the short tax tax. The order was passed 6 162 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, which was an independent section and it was correct to ask for such section Tax was deducted @ 1% tax deduction Considering the deduction, it was reasonable and appropriate to pass an order under section 162 (1). ) Of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, which was a sovereign body and associated with such a situation as is at hand.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Vehari lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.