Find a Lawyer

RIAZ HUSSAIN versus STATE

Under section 10 (3) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), the definition of section 4 and 7 definitions was 20 years of age of the accused under the trial. The accused has not yet disclosed the accused's age. However, in a statement of the accused under section 2342, CRPC, the age was left blank, in the second statement filed under section 2342 of the same case, CRPC age 16/17. The year was recorded, which would mean that on the date of the alleged incident, the defendant was close to the trial court's observation at the age of 14/15/16 when the suspect at the time of the incident was a minor, he showed. Was that under the provisions of Section 7 of the Judicial Justice System Ordinance 2000, if the question arises as to whether any of the persons before, survived for the purpose of this ordinance. If yes, the juvenile court will record a search that involves a medical after such an investigation. A report was required by the trial court to determine the age of the child, when it was learned that the accused was underage and there was no escaping, there was a cursory glare on the accused's face. It is difficult to say that he did not come of age, it was alleged that he should avail himself of the opportunity to claim the deprivation of the minority from the opportunity to claim the rights conferred under a particular law, the cause of justice. Will not be forwarded. Obtain a trial court's remand for a fresh trial under juvenile law, unless the trial court is notified as a juvenile court. property advocates from Bunner lawyer