Find a Lawyer

ALLAH NOOR versus STATE

Section 17 (4) of the Contempt of the Conduct (XLV of 1860), the benefit of the doubt as to the evidence of section 34, the accused was not named in the FIR and he was involved in the case by two bad accused whose confessional statements were waived. After Kalashnikov, he was reportedly exported. The suspect was identified, but there was nothing on record to report that the victim was killed by Kalashnikov's bullets. It is not yet known whether the gun / rifle was used to kill the victim, the prosecution's witnesses and all nine blank bullets recovered. A bullet fired from the victim's body is from Kalashnikov, belonging to the accused. According to the evidence, the shooting on the truck resulted in the release of the two accomplices, which led to the death of the deceased. The confession of the co-confidant who was also an excuse for the co-accused himself was rejected and he remained silent until he was arrested. Only four dummies were available in the identification parade of the accused, which was insufficient for the purposes of identification, the evidence of the dumb person's testimony could not, in itself, be the basis of the conviction of the accused. Was unsuccessful and the accused was entitled to take advantage of the suspect. The jail authorities were appointed to release the charges against the accused. criminal advocate from Tall lawyer