RANA GHULAM DASTGIR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of Section 96 Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), Section 2 (3) refunds were adjusted against the demands of the following year and against the demand of a partner and the balance amount was issued. THI Assisi claimed that there was no demand for the next year at the time of the refund request and that this year's assessment was made by the First Appellate Authority and thus the department would be directed to delay the refund. Pay with extra payment when the cause arises. No Reliable Officer DPC has not received any response to cancel the adjusted amount of assistance, indicating that they did not follow up on the matter. Complainant's kindness. Delay in responding to the taxation officer's letter and requesting the tax officer not to follow up his letter, the DPC's charge should be sought. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Garh More lawyer
