Find a Lawyer

SULEMAN versus STATE

The complainant's denial, in section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), sections 392, 353 and 324/34, alleges that two young men withheld their name after one of them and one of them pistol. The suspect grabbed his cellphone when the complainant made a riot, but fortunately, a pistol with cartridges was recovered from the arrested suspect, persons like the accused, a small amount. In the present case, the accused has been arrested on the spot by the police as well as the courts. PRO was, or the arrest of the accused in such cases was very difficult, however, the High Court did not make any observation about the merits at this stage. The reason for this case is that it can prejudice the parties' case at trial. From the facts of the case, no case for bail was granted, the request for bail was dismissed jobs for advocates from Renala Khurd lawyer