AL-NOOR DEVELOPER & PLANNERS THROUGH KHALID MEHMOOD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
The establishment of the Office of the Federal63 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of the year 2000 2000V), the assessment of the best judgment was defeated because the order has no date and the last It was served months after the date of the hearing. This hearing was not a speaking order and that the Assessing Officer did not follow the instructions of the First Appellate Authority, which declared it illegal and illegal. More than 6 months after the date the complainant / reviewer was notified of an unlicensed order. The communication was contrary to the prescribed law, the order was merely a repeat of the previous diagnostic order and no reason was given for the increase of the total income order. In fact, there was no spelling order. We will seek the provisions of section 122 (5A) of 2001 to restrict the order and proceedings in this matter as per law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Quetta lawyer
