Find a Lawyer

MST. SEEMA JOTOI versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT

Article 65 BBB and 2 452 Children's Marriage Restrictions Act (XIX of 1929), Section 2 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR abolished the age of marriage The applicant married without the consent of his parents. And obtained a free certificate from it. The court of the Judicial Magistrate Father of Petitioner filed an FIR on the basis that he was married while the marriage was being taught when the applicant was examined by a medical examination of the medical board of the High Court and his request was made. At the age of 17, the Medical Board also noted that the applicant had started menstruation for 3/4 years and that she was regular, having fully developed the secondary sex character's breast, knife hair and pubic hair. The effect that the petitioner had reached puberty at his marriage and under section 2 (a) of the Child Marriage Regents Act, 1929, The meaning of the child, if a man, if a man, under 18 and if a girl, under 16, the applicant and her husband, all the case was false and there is no case under section 6565 and B and 2 45 case. The PPC High Court had barred the applicant's parents from interfering in the applicant's peaceful marital life and her husband's petitioner was never abducted and she voluntarily married and terminated the FIR. The same was done under which the petition was allowed advocate for immigration from Kot Bunglow lawyer