Find a Lawyer

KHALILUR REHMAN versus STATE

Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Sub Maintenance Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) bail, the defendant's grant has been behind the bars of the jail since 2005 and the defendant's speedy trial was justified, where the defendant I was successful that there was an unforeseen delay. At the end of the trial and trial, the prosecution's part was unknown, the court could extend it to bail, the chemical was not sent for chemical analysis and weight to confirm the weight of the alleged marijuana, etc. Entire amount of suspicion, enmity between the complainant and its subordinate actions against the investigating officer were also on record in the wrongful interference of the persons. In order to give the accused the benefit of the doubt, it was not necessary that many circumstances were in doubt. Create suspicions, if a reasonable situation can lead to reasonable doubts. Taking care of the accused's guilt, he will then be entitled to such benefit as a matter of right, not as a matter of grace and privilege. The accused was entitled to bail under conditions top civil advocates from Phool nagar lawyer