Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD KHAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 2017, 216, 217 and 169 (4) Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Section RA 739 (I), Dated 12 6 1999 Customs General Order (1997) 1) On January 12, 1997, the Criminal Adjudicating Officer (Additional Collector) got rid of the customs appellate tribunal's truck, rescuing the process of selling and selling goods, paying duty and taxes, and paying fines. According to the Appellate Tribunal order, the complainant approached the concerned authorities for the release of the truck but the department did not release the vehicle on the basis that the Appellate Tribunal Before the order was received by the auction, had been demanding refunds received from the sale of the truck. According to the appellate tribunal order, the High Court directed the department to refund the sale of the auctioned vehicle after deduction of duty, tax and penalty. At the time of the seizure, the department had disclosed the truck's value of Rs 2 million (market value) in the 'confiscation / document' but the vehicle was sold at auction (Rs. 10,63,000) at no cost to the complainant. The auctioneer's additional collector returned Rs. 547,408 after deduction in duty, tax and exemption fines, at the time of auction, according to the provisions of the Customs General Order (1 of 1997), it was necessary to review, Depending on the condition of the vehicle, which was dated 12 1997 1997. Assess him on his physical condition On this account neither the corruption nor the corrupt mp can be attributed to the department for refusing to return his return for the first time since he was fined. Time Complainant inheritance advocates near Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer