Find a Lawyer

RASHID AHMED versus STATE

Section 398 Thanks to the raiding party on receiving specific information about the presence of a legally armed suspect through the execution of robbers at a particular place, the accused was arrested on the spot, who made his presence at strange times. Failed to explain. One hay and three hatchets were recovered from the suspect's possession and a headline reclamation was prepared in the headlights of the police mobile van which was not challenged. There was absolutely no allegation of hostility against members of the raiding party ? On the complaint, the police officer offered explanation for the absence of independent witnesses during the strange hours of the night; the court did not have the fatal to prosecute the prosecution of the weapon, as the counsel for the recovery of the weapons was already recorded. It was revealed by the prosecution witnesses that the said weapons were in the possession of the accused at the time of their confirmation, the MPT for the robbery and they were arrested with weapons which were recovered in the presence of the prosecution witnesses. Were not responsible for any illegality, weakness, misrepresentation or No identification was made and the conviction of the perpetrators was maintained. us immigration advocates from Islamabad lawyer