Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus STATE

Sections 498 (XLV of 1860), Section 506/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3) Pre-arrest Guarantee, FIR confirmation after 26 days delay Submitted. Although the FIR itself, has never been considered suitable for grant of bail, delays can be considered along with other circumstances of the matter, as was the case with other co-accused in the same case. And the rule of consistency demanded that such privileges be requested in their affidavit in support of the request for bail, that if the bail was not granted, it would be disgraced and harassed and the complainant. Police were reluctant to arrest him because of influence, complainant was a news reporter and his influence on police The possibility of, therefore, cannot be ruled out because the police improperly enforced the provisions of the Crimes Against Property. Hodg) Ordinance, 1979 and in this regard, litigation cannot be ruled out, in the circumstances best law firm from Chawinda lawyer