Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR BHUNDI versus FEDERATION OF, PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

18, 19 and 25 Constitution of Pakistan, (1973), Article 199 states the cement bunker truck petitioner among the parties relating to the classification of goods on customs duty matters and the application of special PCT. ? The PCT heading into the vehicle fell under 8705 9000 which has a customs duty of 10%, while according to the department, it came under the PCT Heading 8604 2290 which is owed with duty at 60%. There was a question that went beyond that. The High Court's jurisdiction, but as a department, was found to be illegal, so the High Court had jurisdiction to move the facts. Disputes did not come up on the banned item, otherwise the lawyer would not have been able to persevere without a lawyer for the department. In order to justify or explain how the vehicle falling under the banned items had fallen, the applicant was able to establish the fact that the goods were sent to the EN and then to the PCT Department. Under the heading 8705 9000, the vehicle was being cleaned, while in this particular case it was subjected to discrimination by the High Court and it observed that the department would not deviate from any past action. Accordingly, constitutional application was allowed famous lower court advocate from Ranipur lawyer