Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ ALIAS LANGHRA PIR versus STATE

Section 10 and 11 Definition of Evidence Defendant alleges that he had kidnapped the accused kidnapper with the accused and committed adultery with the accused in connection with the alleged abduction unmarried needle with him. He has entered into a marriage contract with her free will. He was living with her and with her because his wife's alleged abductor had denied the fact of entering into marriage with the accused and accused her of proving that he was a witness to the marriage. The alleged kidnapper did not appear and did not inspect the spouse. According to the law, my production had no value without the regular proof of the marital logic. In the circumstances, the accused was committing the alleged abduction with Zena and his accompanying accused. The accused was acquitted of the charge under Section 11. The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, and no appeal against this breach was filed by the state or the complainant. It was apparent in the circumstances that the alleged victim had gone with the accused with her free consent, the alleged victim had been staying with the accused at various places for more than two months, where she had not been subjected to adultery, nor her Has not raised any resistance, nor has even been reported in the Medico legal report of the alleged kidnapper, showing no signs of violence on any part of his body or on his anus. Was hit, except for the statement of isolation that there was no conclusive evidence on the record. The kidnapper who was subjected to repression of his adultery famous supreme court advocate from Haveli Lakha lawyer