Find a Lawyer

H.M. IQBAL & CO., MULTAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Article 37 Establishment of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 of the XXV), Section 2 (3) Duty Draft on the goods used in the manufacture of exported goods, which is a valid application for the amount claimed in 1987 Minimum payment was made for the least missing documents that were submitted earlier and in August 1998, the department's case was outdated and the complainant's failure to deliver the documents was not feasible. ? The matter was of grave misconduct that the complainant's revised waiver claim filed in 1987 was delayed indefinitely withholding his capital and his payment was delayed and his payment was immense. Except for one or two communications that were delayed, the complainant's remaining letters / reminders were not answered at all. The department has now clearly issued a waiver check, which the complainant hopes the Federal Tax Ombudsman recommends investigating the matter with the Central Board of Revenue so that the complainant's waiver for appropriate treatment and administrative action Reasons for delaying the claim could be identified and all such delays could be detected by inspection of the Customs House Rabbit section. Waiver / Refund Claims and Qualification Instructions law Delayed claims on merit should be dealt with expeditiously as per the provisions of law. \ r \ n lawer from fb area from Kandiaro lawyer