Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID NAZIR versus D.C.O.

In the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petitioner reserves the right to consider the appointment as a son of a retired employee against the reserved quota authority, rather than the specific quota authority. Quota of 20% can be calculated against the total number of positions. In the cadre, only those positions were advertised for recruitment, which was undoubtedly against the mandate of the Punjab Civil Service (Recruitment Ratio) Rules, 1973, for the calculation of posts. It was held that the reserved quota was to be applied only to the number of vacancies / posts declared for recruitment and not to the total number of vacancies in the cadre, it was merely irrational and it was clearly the employees of Punjab ) Rule 3 was the Unlawful Rule 3 of 1973, the proportion of recruitment will apply to the total number of positions in the cadre and the number of ad positions will apply. That can't happen. D / was announced for the time where recruitment was reserved in quota terms, it had to give priority to other appointments to maintain the proportion prescribed under the law, it was undoubtedly the right of eligible candidates, but applied Only when the safe quota has been exhausted and there is still room left for direct appointment, officials, who had to be appointed to any position in the public office, exercise their authority in the public interest and rigorously. Had to In accordance with the law, without any outside consideration or under the authority of a high authority departmental selection committee and then the appointing authority, in the present case, both the applicants of the particular quota, in defiance of the law. famous supreme court advocate from Shemier lawyer